Which advance in biology resulted in improvements in cell technology? If you’re asking this question as a student, then the answer is both “both” and “not both.” As a student, I was interested in knowing which advance in biology resulted in advances in cell technology, but not necessarily because of the importance of the answer.
As a pre-med student, I was quite interested in the changes that occurred in cells as we went through puberty and into adulthood. The changes seemed to be rather static at times, but there were always new and interesting things happening in the human body. I enjoyed reading about these changes, particularly as they related to how the body worked. And I’m still interested in the changes that occur in cells – what they do to the human body and how they relate to disease and aging.
But as a doctor and later an undergraduate researcher, I became more interested in what technology was leading to and resulted in the field of biomedical research. And I began to wonder what the answer would be to the question, “Which advance in biology resulted in advancements in cell technology?” After all, many of the same questions that I had asked as a student emerged as questions I asked of those in the field. One question was whether or not fertilization caused changes in DNA. Another was as to whether or not transcription factors affected cellular growth and development.
These questions elicited some interesting responses from people who study the cell. The first point that someone gave me was that no one can answer the question,” Which advance in biology resulted in advancements in cell technology? “, without answering the questions themselves. Different cells function differently, and so they change and grow in different ways. And so there are multiple factors that combine to determine how well each cell will work and develop.
Someone else mentioned that there is a limit to what science can say about an increase in a certain quality or rate of growth, like making cells grow faster or more efficiently. Meaning that we may never actually see such an increase. And this is true. We don’t know what nature is capable of. And this is true of the cell too.
But another question I asked was as to whether or not an increase in any of the traits which scientists consider to be a good thing is an advance in cell technology. And again, the answer is no. Because again, we don’t know which of these traits will be important for a future person to have, and if there was, we wouldn’t have to study those traits, which is part of the reason we have to study all the cells that make up the human body, because we need them for so many things in our lives.
The question, then, comes back to the original question I posed at the beginning, which was, “How did biology get started on this path that is now in use?” It may have started off with an accidental discovery that sort of thing. But it is a slow progression. And it was the goal of the people who discover these things to eventually come up with a system of cells that will serve all of us better than anything that has been created before. And that is an advance in biology that is a real advance.
So to answer the question, “What which advance in biology resulted in advancements in cell technology?” It was the development of the wheel, and it paved the way for many more developments in biology, including, but not limited to, the development of the eye, the development of the immune system, the development of skin, and many others. It is an incredible story, one that has been told and retold for thousands of years. Now we have a new version of that same story, telling us how the genetic code helped to create the animal we are today.